<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Resources for Science Fiction Writers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cthreepo.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cthreepo.com</link>
	<description>First you dream. Then you Die</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adverb Detector by Paul Cargile</title>
		<link>http://www.cthreepo.com/writing/adverb-detector.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Cargile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cthreepo.com/.shtml#comment-357</guid>
		<description>&quot;On Writing&quot; author Stephen King gives the same advice. 

A greater challenge would be avoiding prepositions. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On Writing&#8221; author Stephen King gives the same advice. </p>
<p>A greater challenge would be avoiding prepositions. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Laws of Good Science Fiction by ARI( :</title>
		<link>http://www.cthreepo.com/writing/laws.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>ARI( :</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cthreepo.com/?page_id=465#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I think your list makes sense. I just dont think you should call it a law. thats like saying someones&#039; writing isnt good just because it doesnt follow your function or structure. I love to read science finction especialy Ray Bradbury &amp; Stephen Kings But That Doesnt mean they have to follow your structure to have a good SF Novel Or story. Maybe they reach the SF audiance on a whole other level? However you are right on the realisticness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your list makes sense. I just dont think you should call it a law. thats like saying someones&#8217; writing isnt good just because it doesnt follow your function or structure. I love to read science finction especialy Ray Bradbury &amp; Stephen Kings But That Doesnt mean they have to follow your structure to have a good SF Novel Or story. Maybe they reach the SF audiance on a whole other level? However you are right on the realisticness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Laws of Good Science Fiction by Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.cthreepo.com/writing/laws.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cthreepo.com/?page_id=465#comment-346</guid>
		<description>The Dune novel is continued with Dune Messiah and Children of Dune. I consider these three to be the basic Dune trilogy. Dune ends well, but there are many unanswered questions and the next two books round things out. I seem to remember that the original Dune as Herbert wrote it included material from these books, but was shortened. The sequels after these three are not really worth reading more than once, but I have reread Dune, Dune Messiah, and Children of Dune many times.

My taste in SF runs from Golden age classics like the Early Robert Heinlein (I think everyone should read &quot;Door Into Summer&quot;). I especially like the Heinlein Juveniles.

I like the modern CyberPunk novels like Gibson. I like Shirley&#039;s Eclipse books. I like Vernor Vinge&#039;s books. Read Vinge&#039;s True Names and other stories.

Asimov is good, but dry. I like Clarke&#039;s short stories better than his novels. 

The later Golden Age has people like Anderson, Pohl, Harry Harrison, and Blish,

The best, though, will always be Ray Bradbury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dune novel is continued with Dune Messiah and Children of Dune. I consider these three to be the basic Dune trilogy. Dune ends well, but there are many unanswered questions and the next two books round things out. I seem to remember that the original Dune as Herbert wrote it included material from these books, but was shortened. The sequels after these three are not really worth reading more than once, but I have reread Dune, Dune Messiah, and Children of Dune many times.</p>
<p>My taste in SF runs from Golden age classics like the Early Robert Heinlein (I think everyone should read &#8220;Door Into Summer&#8221;). I especially like the Heinlein Juveniles.</p>
<p>I like the modern CyberPunk novels like Gibson. I like Shirley&#8217;s Eclipse books. I like Vernor Vinge&#8217;s books. Read Vinge&#8217;s True Names and other stories.</p>
<p>Asimov is good, but dry. I like Clarke&#8217;s short stories better than his novels. </p>
<p>The later Golden Age has people like Anderson, Pohl, Harry Harrison, and Blish,</p>
<p>The best, though, will always be Ray Bradbury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Laws of Good Science Fiction by Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.cthreepo.com/writing/laws.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cthreepo.com/?page_id=465#comment-345</guid>
		<description>As far as fantasy goes...

I am a big fan of Leiber&#039;s Gray Mouser stories, although they are not novels. 

I like Poul Anderson&#039;s SF books. He also wrote a few fantasy books. You should try Three Hears and Three Lions by Anderson.

Of course, there is Conan. Read the Howard books. I assure you that there are no characters even remotely similar to Arnold.

I reread Edgar Rice Burrough&#039;s Mars books every few years. They are fantasy, even if they take place on Mars.

Andre Norton&#039;s Witch World series started out as one stand-alone book and slowly grew so you can read the first few Witch World books without having to read sever 10 pound sequels.

Fantasy books before J.R.R. Tolkien were usually a single novel and under 100K words, so look for good fantasy from the 40s 50s and 60s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as fantasy goes&#8230;</p>
<p>I am a big fan of Leiber&#8217;s Gray Mouser stories, although they are not novels. </p>
<p>I like Poul Anderson&#8217;s SF books. He also wrote a few fantasy books. You should try Three Hears and Three Lions by Anderson.</p>
<p>Of course, there is Conan. Read the Howard books. I assure you that there are no characters even remotely similar to Arnold.</p>
<p>I reread Edgar Rice Burrough&#8217;s Mars books every few years. They are fantasy, even if they take place on Mars.</p>
<p>Andre Norton&#8217;s Witch World series started out as one stand-alone book and slowly grew so you can read the first few Witch World books without having to read sever 10 pound sequels.</p>
<p>Fantasy books before J.R.R. Tolkien were usually a single novel and under 100K words, so look for good fantasy from the 40s 50s and 60s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Laws of Good Science Fiction by Nuxxy</title>
		<link>http://www.cthreepo.com/writing/laws.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuxxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cthreepo.com/?page_id=465#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Read Dune. I&#039;ve been put off reading the rest of it by the recycling of characters
Really need to read some Asimov, but I&#039;ve struggled to find in libraries here in SA.
Used to roleplay Cyberpunk 20/20, but need to read more of Gibson.
Read all the Tolkien there is. Stopped just short of actually learning Quenya and Sindarin.
Read most of the Riftwar, but I actually preferred the Empire saga with Janny Wurts.
Also Cycle of Fire, Deathgate, Earthsea. About to start Game of Thrones.

But I was specifically asking about the more recent stuff, especially sci-fi. Like Iain M. Banks Culture series. I go to the bookshop, and, once you get past the heady influx of emo teen vampire crap, there and a lot of books that I just don&#039;t know if it&#039;s worth my while even starting, especially if it&#039;s a series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read Dune. I&#8217;ve been put off reading the rest of it by the recycling of characters<br />
Really need to read some Asimov, but I&#8217;ve struggled to find in libraries here in SA.<br />
Used to roleplay Cyberpunk 20/20, but need to read more of Gibson.<br />
Read all the Tolkien there is. Stopped just short of actually learning Quenya and Sindarin.<br />
Read most of the Riftwar, but I actually preferred the Empire saga with Janny Wurts.<br />
Also Cycle of Fire, Deathgate, Earthsea. About to start Game of Thrones.</p>
<p>But I was specifically asking about the more recent stuff, especially sci-fi. Like Iain M. Banks Culture series. I go to the bookshop, and, once you get past the heady influx of emo teen vampire crap, there and a lot of books that I just don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s worth my while even starting, especially if it&#8217;s a series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Laws of Good Science Fiction by Nasher</title>
		<link>http://www.cthreepo.com/writing/laws.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cthreepo.com/?page_id=465#comment-343</guid>
		<description>...and, yes, It&#039;s true, there&#039;s not much of single SF/fantasy novels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and, yes, It&#8217;s true, there&#8217;s not much of single SF/fantasy novels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Laws of Good Science Fiction by Nasher</title>
		<link>http://www.cthreepo.com/writing/laws.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Nasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cthreepo.com/?page_id=465#comment-342</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is there any recent sci-fi you would recommend reading? I just want to read good fantasy or science fiction, but it seems that fantasy is all book X of 10, and sci-fi is all short stories. Oh how I long for authors to just write great single novels!&quot;

Depends on what kind of sci-fi/fantasy you like. I would add some of my favorites:

anything by A.C.Clarke - mostly technological or &quot;philosophical&quot; sci-fi
Frank Herbert(+ his son and others) - anything from Dune universe(I really recommend to read it from it&#039;s very beginning(Butlerian Djihad is the first book in the series)
Isaac Asimov - Foundation
Dune and Foundation are multi-part novels so don&#039;t worry about the length :-)
W.Gibson - Neuromancer, Johny Mnemonic - Gibson is considered father of cyberpunk, very interesting reading but for someone it may be too difficult

fantasy:
If you only read LOTR or Hobbit from Tolkien&#039;s books about Middle-earth, there&#039;s more:
Silmarillion - myths and legends of Middle-earth and events preceding and thus explaining some things and references in LOTR
The Book of Unfinished Tales - collection of mostly unfinished works on Middle-earth - many people don&#039;t know there are two parts
Hurin&#039;s children - the longest of the &quot;unfinished tales&quot; finally completed. It was published only recently by his son.

R.E.Feist - Riftwar Cycle(probably most known book is Betrayal at Krondor)
A.Szapkowski - The Witcher saga - sometimes incorporates even &quot;naturalistic&quot; approach to fantasy(btw this story was made into quite good RPG PC game just recently)

off course there are many more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is there any recent sci-fi you would recommend reading? I just want to read good fantasy or science fiction, but it seems that fantasy is all book X of 10, and sci-fi is all short stories. Oh how I long for authors to just write great single novels!&#8221;</p>
<p>Depends on what kind of sci-fi/fantasy you like. I would add some of my favorites:</p>
<p>anything by A.C.Clarke &#8211; mostly technological or &#8220;philosophical&#8221; sci-fi<br />
Frank Herbert(+ his son and others) &#8211; anything from Dune universe(I really recommend to read it from it&#8217;s very beginning(Butlerian Djihad is the first book in the series)<br />
Isaac Asimov &#8211; Foundation<br />
Dune and Foundation are multi-part novels so don&#8217;t worry about the length :-)<br />
W.Gibson &#8211; Neuromancer, Johny Mnemonic &#8211; Gibson is considered father of cyberpunk, very interesting reading but for someone it may be too difficult</p>
<p>fantasy:<br />
If you only read LOTR or Hobbit from Tolkien&#8217;s books about Middle-earth, there&#8217;s more:<br />
Silmarillion &#8211; myths and legends of Middle-earth and events preceding and thus explaining some things and references in LOTR<br />
The Book of Unfinished Tales &#8211; collection of mostly unfinished works on Middle-earth &#8211; many people don&#8217;t know there are two parts<br />
Hurin&#8217;s children &#8211; the longest of the &#8220;unfinished tales&#8221; finally completed. It was published only recently by his son.</p>
<p>R.E.Feist &#8211; Riftwar Cycle(probably most known book is Betrayal at Krondor)<br />
A.Szapkowski &#8211; The Witcher saga &#8211; sometimes incorporates even &#8220;naturalistic&#8221; approach to fantasy(btw this story was made into quite good RPG PC game just recently)</p>
<p>off course there are many more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Laws of Good Science Fiction by Nuxxy</title>
		<link>http://www.cthreepo.com/writing/laws.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuxxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cthreepo.com/?page_id=465#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Is there any recent sci-fi you would recommend reading? I just want to read good fantasy or science fiction, but it seems that fantasy is all book X of 10, and sci-fi is all short stories. Oh how I long for authors to just write great single novels!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any recent sci-fi you would recommend reading? I just want to read good fantasy or science fiction, but it seems that fantasy is all book X of 10, and sci-fi is all short stories. Oh how I long for authors to just write great single novels!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Space Math by Jon B</title>
		<link>http://www.cthreepo.com/lab/math1.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cthreepo.com/?page_id=225#comment-340</guid>
		<description>Awesome!  If you travel at the highest known non-light speed acceleration (which would land you anywhere infinitely instantaneously from the travelers perspective at least), you would accelerate at 10^12 g&#039;s, the acceleration experienced in free fall into a neutron star.  If you accelerated at a constant rate for ~2 minutes 49, then decelerated with the same force for the same amount of time, you would reach the end of the known universe, 13 billion light years from home.  Of course, by then, the Earth and our solar system would have long since passed into dust (just a few seconds after launch, from the travelers perspective), but you would have lived to see the physical boundary of space!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome!  If you travel at the highest known non-light speed acceleration (which would land you anywhere infinitely instantaneously from the travelers perspective at least), you would accelerate at 10^12 g&#8217;s, the acceleration experienced in free fall into a neutron star.  If you accelerated at a constant rate for ~2 minutes 49, then decelerated with the same force for the same amount of time, you would reach the end of the known universe, 13 billion light years from home.  Of course, by then, the Earth and our solar system would have long since passed into dust (just a few seconds after launch, from the travelers perspective), but you would have lived to see the physical boundary of space!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Space Math by Jon B</title>
		<link>http://www.cthreepo.com/lab/math1.shtml/comment-page-1#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cthreepo.com/?page_id=225#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting!  I wish some idiots would answer the Yahoo questions correctly regarding relativistic travel.  The major misconceptions about it should be corrected!  Glad to see somebody is publishing correct information though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting!  I wish some idiots would answer the Yahoo questions correctly regarding relativistic travel.  The major misconceptions about it should be corrected!  Glad to see somebody is publishing correct information though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
